Dan Added vs Pietro Orlando Fellin Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: In recent months, Added has a slight edge by winning 44.96% of points on their second serve compared to Fellin's 40.95%. Does this stat help predict the outcome? Yes, it has high predictive accuracy.
• Return Game Stats: While Fellin outperforms Added with 45.78% of opponent's second serve returns compared to Added's 43.71%, Fellin also leads in first serve returns with 29.03% over Added's 25.03%.
• Under Pressure Analysis: Added shows greater resilience under pressure, having saved 53.77% of break points recently, surpassing Fellin's 47.95%.
• Performance Overview: Over the past year, Fellin has a slightly superior win rate of 70.51% compared to Added's 68.42% in matches played, offering insights into their competitive caliber.
• Surface Preference: Both players excel on Hard courts; Added has a win rate of 63%, trailing behind Fellin's 71%.
• Player Level: Both have predominantly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events with similar winning percentages; Added at 72.37% and Fellin at 72.73%.
• Quality of Opponents: Fellin has faced slightly tougher opponents with an average rank of 384.58, as opposed to Added's 406.24.
• Deciding Set Performance: In matches going to a final set, Added has a higher success rate at 69%, compared to Fellin's 55%, a crucial factor in tight contests.
• Break Point Conversion: Fellin has a slight edge with a 37.16% conversion rate on break points against Added's 32.72%, indicating better capitalization on pivotal moments.

Editorial Prediction (August 19, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match between Added and Fellin presents an intriguing contrast of strengths. Added appears to excel in high-pressure scenarios, showing superior resilience by saving a higher percentage of break points. Additionally, their ability to secure deciding sets more frequently suggests outstanding mental fortitude.

Fellin, however, seems to perform better in capitalizing on break point opportunities and exhibits slight dominance in returning first serves, which can create more scoring chances.

Both players display a similar performance trend at the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, but Fellin’s exposure to slightly higher-ranked opponents might give them an experiential edge.

Considering these variables, although the match could be closely contested, Fellin is predicted to be the likely winner due to their more advantageous return game and opponent quality faced.